Talk:Accounting Today

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Don't see the problem

I really don't see the problem with this page. I'd be happy to modify it but "Multiple issues" is rather vague. It's short. Concise. Completely neutral. The tags all look good. It's definitely notable. What am I missing? --Cpatechnut (talk) 17:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the note. In WP's nomenclature, "multiple issues" is just a way to indicate that it's been tagged with more than one problem template (cleanup and in-line references). Primarily what you need to do is use the references you have at the bottom of the page and use them to source the article inside the text of the article. For instance, there's an assertion about the publication's circulation. While that information may be supported inside one of the references at the bottom, Wikipedia's preferred style is for you to insert an in-line reference link at the point where an assertion of fact is made (this will insert a footnote basically). For more information on how to do this browse through WP:CITE. Thanks again. — e. ripley\^talk 17:13, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks E. Ripley. --Cpatechnut (talk) 19:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accounting Today. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100128025054/http://solutions.sourcemedia.com/our_audience.html to http://solutions.sourcemedia.com/our_audience.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]