Talk:Aenor

Anthroponymy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

upon reviewing the sources, it seems clear to me that Aenor and Alienor came to be considered equivalent by the 13th century, and the form Aenor became obsolete, replaced by Alienor (Eleanor) even in retrospect (i.e. applied to women who lived in the 11th century and during their lifetime would have been known as Aenor exclusively). It seems plausible that the "hinge" for this was Eleanor of Aquitaine, via alia Aenor, but even if this is rejected, the ultimate outcome is the same, Alienor is simply the 1200s form of what used to be Aenor in the 11th century. So possibly this page could or should be merged into Eleanor#Origin. --dab (𒁳) 08:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]