This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Also, given the tone of your question, I considered not replying, to be honest. The sources used did not mention the actor, maybe, but proved the film existed or explained what it was, so not the best sources, maybe not even NEEDED ref, nor useful, but not OR; feel free to add better sources, sure.
Here too, I reverted your removal. Punctual unsourced statements and original research are two different issues imv. The roles are easily verifiable. If you think something is unsourced, adding the tag Template:Reference Needed or other of the kind or Failed verification/Not in source seems more appropriate than removing something that is easily verifiable. Or at least use this template. So, yes, I had checked and no, this is not "basically OR", and no, the removal was not appropriate. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)10:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
