Talk:Airman's coin

Numismatics Low‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

United States: Military history Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

Coin Photo

Well, this article now has a picture of the coin. We may want to think about replacing it if we can get a nicer picture of the coin (less glare and scratches, etc). Bburton 23:02, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be nice if we could, but you'd probably have to get one that hasn't been handed out yet, or has been sitting on some shelf somewhere. For those of us that have them, following tradition means keeping them on our person, possibly with the other challenge coins we've earned, leading to scratching and wear. Not including the occasional ding from being slammed on a bar table :P AmishCellPhone 03:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I may be able to help with that, my coin and my wife's coin are in pretty good shape. I havn't taken a long look at this article, but I think that I can help. I will need help though, becuase I am not wiki-savvy at all. I'm quite new at editing.Stevejsam (talk) 11:21, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Initial Review

I have read the article, and while it is entertaining, I would like to start a consensus as to the division of it. I think that it is one large run-on, and that it could stand to be divided into several sections. the last post on this talk page was in 2006, So.... Is anyone here and interested in firing this article up out of stub status?Stevejsam (talk) 11:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have read through the sole source in this article, and it looks like a majority of the wiki article was lifted whole sale from the PACAF article. I think that most of the entire section regarding the tale of where the coin originated from needs to be removed, and that only a small selection of the myth of the birth of the coin should remain, with an in-line quotation.Stevejsam (talk) 01:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed

Just looked at the article, and it's incredibly out of date. The coin's appearance changed quite a bit.

New airmans coin photo.

I uploaded http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Airmans_coin_2010.JPG There are no copyrights have at it to improve the article.John (talk) 04:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edits without consensus

Reverted a change that someone made without any contribution or consensus on talk page. Will continue to guard the page from vandals like jaymedinc Please post in the discussion if you wish to contribute, as well as sign your posts Stevejsam (talk) 05:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Layout

Does anyone know how to get the two photos next to each other at right instead of one above the other? RJFJR (talk) 16:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airman's coin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081212213928/http://www.pacaf.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123043494&page=2 to http://www.pacaf.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123043494&page=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]