Talk:Alabama's at-large congressional district

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Alabama

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

U.S. Congress B‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) Place(s).

Discrepancy

In United States Congressional Delegations from Alabama, the only congress that is indicated as having the delegation elected At-large is the 88th.--Appraiser 22:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected that now. —Markles 10:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't there be an * on 43rd, 44th, 63rd, and 64th? How about changes to the ordinal congresses? The 88th has A/L for the Alabama delegation, whereas the 43rd, 44th, etc. have district numbers.--Appraiser 13:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the 43, 44, 63, 64 only one seat was At-large. I've abondoned "*"s on the delegation articles when I've instead been able to note clearly that the seat was at-large. As for the ordinal congresses, those need to be changed. My source for the delegation article is Martis, which I trust. —Markles 13:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK; is the table in General ticket now accurate and complete, so I can use it to correct the ordinals and delegation articles?--Appraiser 15:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea. I did very little work on the current version.—Markles 16:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alabama's at-large congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]