Talk:Albert Ludwig Sigesmund Neisser

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 10:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Albert Ludwig Sigesmund Neisser/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Talk:Albert Ludwig Sigesmund Neisser

Very interesting material on an important physician. I believe Dr. Neisser also discovered the menigococcus,which causes meningitis , Meningococcus neisseria.

Since he is a distant relative, i am interested in finding out more about his family. Any ideas how this can be persued?

````Renate

Last edited at 05:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

About health control on prostitutes[edit]

This is a false belief, as if somebody has any kind of control, resulting in 'clean' diagnosis, no one can guarantee five minutes later that individual won't have acquired a sexually transmitted disease and have it passed to others. Simply, the task is impossible; a similar thing appeared in screening of some malignancies, were a 'Window effect' showed, cases appearing in the period between one screening intervention and the next. The wrong proposal of abandon of PSA screening for prostate cancer, it is still useful in high risk populations, reduction in its use resulted in a higher number of prostate cancer cases detected in advanced stage, is to be brought into consideration. A very high risk behaviour, as paid sex, promiscuity (WHO defines as 'promiscuous' anyone having had full sex with four or more different partners in their lifetime), drug use, is a high risk behavior; as the 'commandments' never reduced the incidence of fornication, STS, murders, wasting money and resources in some types of screening is to be reassessed. By implementing some kind of measures, HRAs could become partners in a crime, concealers, supporters of an undesirable activity. it is the Risk takers who must first care of themselves, for this, education is the best approach. Beware of dog!