Talk:Aleksandr Kharchikov

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Официальный сайт harchikov.pp.ru it isn't correct 92.101.200.248 (talk) 18:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of this article is disputed

He has his supporters and their view is here (aggressively, judging by this edit) ignored. He is considered a hero and an ultra-patriot by the marginal Neonazi, National-communist and neoStalinist groups in Russia. - Yes. But he also regularly features at the Russian Communist Party site.[1]. Although Kharchikov's songs meet the prosecutable criteria of Russia's criminal code (such as the articles that cover fomenting interethnic strife) he has never been faced with legal action. This has led to widespread suspicions that he has Russian government's tacit support. - Wrong, for at least 2 reasons. a) Being pro-/and per/secuted is what he's craving for; to sue him would be the stupidest thing Russian authorities could possibly do, giving him publicity he doesn't deserve. b) If the Russian wiki article tells me correctly, unfortunately, he actually has been sued. And is on his way to acquiring a long-sought martyr aura, which is a shame. Incidentally, citing song titles by way of 'proving' one's point is a dubiuos move, to say the least. One may call a song whatever one want without breaking any criminal or administrative laws. And (incidentally) a wiki article is not supposed to actually champion any point, let alone try to prove it. Hence "Original research" template. -- Evermore2 (talk) 08:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The damning 1/4 of this page has been here used, the celebratory 3/4 of the very same page - discarded? Deplorable, even if familiar, tactics. -- Evermore2 (talk) 12:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but the subject is not known for anything outside of his iflammatory output. You may add a differing opinion, provided that it is reliably sourced.--Galassi (talk) 15:18, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aleksandr Kharchikov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615003622/http://www.minjust.ru/ru/activity/nko/fedspisok/ to http://www.minjust.ru/ru/activity/nko/fedspisok/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]