Talk:Alliance of Evil
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Alliance 2.jpg
[edit]Image:Alliance 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:XF05.jpg
[edit]Image:XF05.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
opinions on the Members section
[edit]I would like to request people's opinion on the suitably for this article of the "Members" section shown here.--Rockfang (talk) 09:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
There is already a list of the members in the SHB. That section is just a repetition. DCincarnate (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment The "It's in the infobox" falls flat. By that logic there is no need to put into this article, or any article using the 'box:
- Publisher(s)
- First appearance
- Creator(s)
- Base(s)
- Power(s)
- Alter egos
- Or anything else that can be listed in the 'box.
- The 'box, like the lead is supposed to encapsulate what is in the article, not replace it. And you know, the funny thing is that, given the size of the article, I'd rather change the 'box by replacing:
- "|members=[[Joanna Cargill|Frenzy]]<br>[[Tower (comics)|Tower]]<br>[[Stinger (comics)|Stinger]]<br>[[Timeshadow]]"
- with:
- "|fullroster=''See: [[#Members|Members]]''"
- The 'box is the "top of page snapshot", for longer articles, the team list is good to have there. Here, where the article isn't so long...
- - J Greb (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment The "It's in the infobox" falls flat. By that logic there is no need to put into this article, or any article using the 'box:
B-Class Assesment required
[edit]This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 11:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Alliance of Evil/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
== The change to C class == The article only has 1 citation.--Rockfang (talk) 11:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 11:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)