From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


  • All the names of Upanishads have a meaning in Sanskrit.

Allo Upanishad has no meaning at all. This itself proves it is bogus.... right? -- (talk) 07:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC) True to Allah

  • People trying to show other religons are copies and bad religons are doing a lot of damage to their own religon.One should read and practice all religons and select the best,but one needs a long time to understand it completely.Even if you follow your own religon properly you will not need another one.So please dont damage and criticise others and have confidence in your own faith.All the best.

Link this article to the end of everything. --GuruNanakDKesh101 (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Wonder why people want to confuse things? The "Allopanishad" is a book of doubtful origin and the wiki entry is misleading. The "Atharva Veda" does not mention this book at all! While "Googling", I noticed that some sites are citing the "wiki reference" to be valid!

I've made a few changes and further written that "this is a book of dubious origin". If anyone has any kind of updates/changes, please discuss in the talk page and then make the changes. I cannot help agreeing with the above comments from the user "GuruNankDKesh101". freewit (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)