This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
All the names of Upanishads have a meaning in Sanskrit.
Allo Upanishad has no meaning at all. This itself proves it is bogus.... right? --184.108.40.206 (talk) 07:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC) True to Allah
People trying to show other religons are copies and bad religons are doing a lot of damage to their own religon.One should read and practice all religons and select the best,but one needs a long time to understand it completely.Even if you follow your own religon properly you will not need another one.So please dont damage and criticise others and have confidence in your own faith.All the best.
Wonder why people want to confuse things? The "Allopanishad" is a book of doubtful origin and the wiki entry is misleading. The "Atharva Veda" does not mention this book at all! While "Googling", I noticed that some sites are citing the "wiki reference" to be valid!
I've made a few changes and further written that "this is a book of dubious origin". If anyone has any kind of updates/changes, please discuss in the talk page and then make the changes. I cannot help agreeing with the above comments from the user "GuruNankDKesh101". freewit (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)