Talk:American pantomime

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American pantomime article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 15 February 2012 by reviewer Dcshank (talk · contribs).

Musical Theatre

American pantomime is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre articles

Is there any such thing? - Merge into Pantomime

I am not persuaded that there is any such genre as "American panto". There are no references here that support finding such a genre. This article seems merely to describe a few American productions of British-style pantomimes. Can anyone show that "American pantomime" is an encyclopedic topic? Or, pehaps the article could be called Pantomimes in America. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:57, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I shudder to think. I'll believe it when Hollywood starts doing remakes of Carry On films.TheLongTone (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Someone tried to add information about a NY-based community theatre group. If there are no professional pantomime companies in the U.S., I think it is fairly clear that this article should be merged into pantomime. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree this should be merged with Pantomime. --Cornellier (talk) 03:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (I independently proposed this at Talk:Pantomime in the RfC over there; not realizing it had been discussed here before. This means this merge has been unopposed for over three years. Just do it (someone who knows the subject better than I do). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 07:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Panto

The term "panto" is slang for "pantomime". I think we should use the word "pantomime" throughout, except in direct quotes. I do not believe that the references given in this article support using the term "American panto" instead of "pantomime". -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:28, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree. As a Brit, I know that "panto" is widely used as a slang word, often used by the tabloids and the gutter press in reviews and advertisements. it is also frequently used by the celebrity circuit who often star in them at Christmas. To swap the name to "panto" would be a bit like naming an article "A list of American RomComs" instead of "A list of American Romantic Comedies". -- Cassianto ^Talk 07:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed "panto" isn't encyclopedic. It's like referring to conversations skills as "convo skillz". — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 07:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Americans in British pantomime

What relevance is "Americans in British pantomime" to this article? Is this not about American pantomime, or pantomime in America? -- Cassianto ^Talk 11:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I have removed the section. -- Ssilvers (talk) 11:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Audience participation

I noticed that this section had only one reference. Clicking on the reference, I saw that it was a link to a page from the University of Bristol, so it had nothing to do with American pantomime. I have deleted most of it but left the main assertion with a request for a cite. -- Ssilvers (talk) 11:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]