Jump to content

Talk:Anind Dey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expert

[edit]

Anind Dey is a professor at the world's premier institution for both human-computer interaction and computer science. He is also one of the foremost experts in context-aware computing. As such, he is obviously and clearly notable. Gillianrh (talk) 04:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs to be expanded to assert this and provide verifiable references. As it is, it does not demonstrate notability according to WP:PROF. Jfire (talk) 04:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would disagree that Carnegie Mellon is the world's premier institution for HCI. Conferences are often a barometer used to indicate leading schools in an area. Though some papers were accepted from the HCI institute at CMU, many more were accepted from rival institutions such as U. Washington and GaTech. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Curiusor (talkcontribs) 22:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown which conferences Curiusor is referring to. The publishing average of the HCII at CMU is significantly higher than any other academic institution for many conferences in the field. For example, please see approximate publication totals for CHI, included below:

Number of Full Papers Published at CHI, 2003-2008

  • Microsoft 80
  • Carnegie Mellon 73
  • IBM 43
  • U. Washington 42
  • Georgia Tech 38
  • UC Berkeley 38
  • MIT 31
  • PARC 27
  • Stanford 27
  • U. Michigan 20
  • U. Maryland. 17
  • UC Irvine 14
  • Sun 2

Number of Short Papers & Posters Published at CHI, 2003-2008

  • Carnegie Mellon 77
  • MIT 67
  • Microsoft 53
  • IBM 51
  • Georgia Tech 46
  • UC Berkeley 41
  • U. Michigan 39
  • Stanford 36
  • U. Washington 30
  • PARC 23
  • U. Maryland. 20
  • UC Irvine 14
  • Viktoria Inst. 10
  • York University 10
  • Sun 7

please check the context awareness article

[edit]

There you will see that Anind Dey is listed as one of the pioneers and referenced repeatedly. Furthermore, this article is linked from that article. That should be enough to assert notability, although I (and others I am sure) will continue to add to this article. Could you give me some guidance on what else you might specifically like? Thanks! Gillianrh (talk) 05:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you are on the right track with your expansions. WP:PROF goes into details about what notability means for academics. In this case, it would be helpful to know which of Dey's publications are especially significant and why, what his major contributions to the field of context-aware computing are (from context awareness it appears he may have defined context as a term of art in the field?), and if he has received any awards or honors. And of course, referencing published secondary sources is very important. Jfire (talk) 05:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The edits by User:T0ddw0ng are exactly what is needed. Thanks! Jfire (talk) 05:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, thanks much! I am still new and trying to sort all this out :) Gillianrh (talk) 05:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anind Dey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]