Talk:Ann Arbor–Detroit Regional Rail

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Owner and Operate

Which agency/organization/corporation will own and operate the rail and service along it? I don't see any mention of that in the article, and that's very important. It's probably that the article be kept consistent with other transit lines and systems by someone providing an infobox for it. --Criticalthinker (talk) 03:43, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not cancelled

The project is not canceled can someone update it. One news paper stated it was and the rest followed. IF it was canceled why would they still be working on the rail cars and wanting Amtrak to run the thanksgiving event trains.--F4280 (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't say that it is cancelled. If you're reading that into what is written, that's too bad. --Criticalthinker (talk) 06:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We can only work within the sources available, the source says 'indefinitely suspended' which is what we say. I have put the phrase in quotation marks to make it clear that it is a quote. What this article really needs is some more detail. The history section is very thin, a map would be good. It would be great if someone could go through the references and add more figures, content and justification to the article. PeterEastern (talk) 08:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What happened was one newspaper said it was canceled and the rest followed suit. The MITRAIN as it will be called will use EX GOT F59PH locomotives there's a picture of one in Canada in the new Silver blue and green paint number 18533 --F4280 (talk) 07:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no practical difference between canceled and perpetually two years away. But yes, we should just report what the sources say. Kendall-K1 (talk) 03:13, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]