Talk:Annapurna Sanctuary

Nepal Mid‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discussion: Hiking - Walkopedia

Hi all,

In my first time editing Wiki I think I may have unintentionally edited in a way warranted deletion a week or so ago. I feel that walking in the Annapurna Sanctuary warrants more than the brief allusion it receives in the text's body, especially to westerners for whom the area is likely unfamiliar.

Where do you suggest a good starting point would be ? To clarify, walkopedia (a reference to which I edited into the article) is not a commercial website, selling anything, but an walking-centric information store much like wiki. My hope was that other similar sites woould follow suit, so that the walker has all the information they could want at their fingertips...

Suggest as an external link as opposed to section in the article's main body? Alternatively I could post on this forum another version of some wording for you to review?

Best,

Billjohnsonwalko (talk) 13:47, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to mess up some links, but Pokhara is not "Nepal's second city". Biratnagar is much bigger. Petrus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.212.96 (talk) 20:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Annapurna Sanctuary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513130816/http://www.neatadventure.com/annapurna_sanctuary_trek.php to http://www.neatadventure.com/annapurna_sanctuary_trek.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning ⚠️ severe danger if you follow the info on this page

This page is a car crash of wrong information. Simply look at the links for why. I have tracked extensively in this region & the wiki page makes a dangerous error of the Annapurna Base Camp trek being the same as the Annapurna Santuary trek. To the best of my knowledge, I was the first to fully complete & explore the Mardi Himyal trek in January 2010 . My route encompassed Annapurna Santuary. However a link up from the Santuary to Annapurna Base Camp has never been done to my knowledge, as of February 2023. It would be a stunning link up & one that I did attempt. However there are some very steep hillsides, dense bamboo & rhododendron forests & rivers in the way & only 1 village on the whole of the section I was attempting. I had written my last words & said my goodbyes to life, but thankfully I escaped off the new route, back to a wonderfully kind local village. Someone needs to edit the wiki article so it really is about Annapurna Santuary as Jimmy Roberts aptly described it. Eco-climber (talk) 22:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see ABC mentioned in the article now, except the legend to the pic, but if it was before, it's because of the big sign as you enter the trekking huts in the Sanctuary, which says Annapurna Base Camp. An actual base camp for Annapurna north face would clearly be much further up in that direction. The huts are close to what is considered the Huinchuli BC. JuanTamad (talk) 09:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]