Talk:Antonia García de Videgain
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Antonia García de Videgain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150530051131/http://www.vistaalegredigital.com/pdf/a%C3%B1os/2012/12DICIEMBRE2012/V.A.01-12-2012.pdf to http://www.vistaalegredigital.com/pdf/a%C3%B1os/2012/12DICIEMBRE2012/V.A.01-12-2012.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
References
[edit]I have removed the recently-added references, because none of them seem to document anything in the article, or are so poorly formatted I couldn't tell what they were (and I wasn't about to download and potentially infect my computer just to find out). Please use inline citations, so it is clear what reference is documenting what facts in the article. Also, please use appropriate descriptions - a scholarly journal article (if that is what it is) should be described with authors, title, journal, volumes and pages, not just mention of the university web site that hosts a scholarly paper service and a Url that launches an auto-download (using the Dialnet page for the article is preferable to the pdf URL, so that the reader can be sure what it is they are going to download, and that it is coming from a trusted site, first). Agricolae (talk) 20:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)