Jump to content

Talk:Architecture of Liverpool

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The article gives the impression that The Williamson Tunnels and St James Cemetary are derelict. They are not, bot ave acrive friends groups and the Williamson Tunnels even has a Heritage Centre and is a tourist attraction. Consider changing to reflect these facts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.187.158 (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see how it's misleading. Both the sites you mention were certainly derelict for a long time. The paragraph then goes on to say that they may not be so now, and anyone can click on a link to find out more about each site. RodCrosby (talk) 10:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Ancient Chapel of Toxteth

[edit]

In the Stuart Architecture section, the sentence on the Ancient Chapel of Toxteth starting "The building is today a ..." seems to say Grade I listed building, but hovering over the "Grade I" link reveals instead Grade II. Which is it? If the "Toxteth Unitary Chapel" page is to be believed, it is Grade I. Presumably "Grade II" was a typo. This should be fixed (by someone who knows more than me). 68.149.182.57 (talk) 04:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Architecture of Liverpool. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Everyman Theatre

[edit]

Hi All- I think the Everyman Theatre on Hope Street needs to be considered for this page, especially as it was the recipient of the RIBA Stirling prize in 2014. Will make a start on it soon, if there are no objections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeaAndOranges (talk • contribs) 16:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Architecture of Liverpool. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Architecture of Liverpool. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Architecture_of_Liverpool&oldid=1252674241"