- Assessment note
- Further references are needed, especially for the general concept.—ERcheck (talk) 12:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- 1 White flag
- 2 Cessation of Hostilities Agreements
- 3 Korean armistice
- 4 Ceasefire?
- 5 Armistice and Surrendering
- 6 "Important" armistices
- 7 Copyvio?
- 8 External links modified
- 9 Did hear that the Knights Templers and Salindin signed a five year truce in Jeruslum Do canconfliciting Religio.Politcal truces be done?
An empty white box is a poor illustration of a white flag. Lumos3 10:32, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed. If a suitable image of a white flag is not uploaded, we should remove the empty white image. Webdinger 23:58, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Cessation of Hostilities Agreements
The term Cessation of Hostilities Agreement seems to be rather common in the context of a number of recent conflicts in Africa and Asia. I'm wondering does the concept need it's own article, or should it be incorporated into this one? Mostlyharmless 23:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure, because the NYTimes never specifically states that this is a peace treaty, but does this information affect the blurb about North and South Korea?: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/04/world/asia/04korea.html?th&emc=th
- they haven't signed a peace treaty, they've only signed an agreement to work on one.--Jeff 19:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
If it does, that content should be changed to "armistice which occured in 1953, but did not end in a peace treaty until 2007." 184.108.40.206 13:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Armistice and Surrendering
The surrender (military) article states that a surrender between nations is achieved by the signing of an armistice. The armistice article states that a key aspect of armistice is that "all fighting ends with no one surrendering." Both lack any citations. Obviously one of these statements is wrong. ialsoagree (talk) 18:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
What's the metric for determining which armistices are important enough to be included in the "Important armistices in history" section? I can kind of see how the 1918 armistice was a biggie, but why is the Korean one more important than, say, the Peace of Westphalia? Who decided that? Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 00:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know. As much of WP is US-centric, the KWA is of interest to many readers and important in that regard. Certainly feel free to fix!--S. Rich (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
I'm not that firm with history, that's why I won't do the changes myself, but IMHO one of the most important armistices of the 20th century would be the one between Nazi-Germany (represented by Großadmiral Dönitz) on one side the allieds (France, Great Britton (PM Winston Churchil), Sowjet Union (Stalin) and the USA) on the other side. The real end of WWII came only with the fall of the »Berliner Mauer« and the following reunification of Germany, since before that it wasn't possible to negotiate any peace treaty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5C0:1000:B:0:0:0:9A9 (talk) 11:44, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Did this guy basically plagiarize the entire contents of this article for his 2011 book, or is there an older version of his book that somebody stole for this article? Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 16:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Armistice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/mideast/stories/history.maps/armistice.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130602140605/http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~dreiter/LHR%20IO%2008%20codebook.pdf to http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~dreiter/LHR%20IO%2008%20codebook.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
You may set the
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.
Did hear that the Knights Templers and Salindin signed a five year truce in Jeruslum Do canconfliciting Religio.Politcal truces be done?
he article is great! But wonderng if warring groups hose say of conflicting religious views can also sign a armistice? believe this was done(for awhile) inFrance between warring,Catholics and Protests(Heugonauts?) ThanksEddson storms (talk) 06:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)