Talk:Arnold van den Bergh

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 January 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands

Jewish history Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Appropriate?

Oof. I'm really not sure this article is appropriate, at the present time. At the moment, all we have on this person's notability is a speculative study that suggests they -may- have been involved in the betrayal of the Frank family. I don't feel that's enough to go on. If anything, I'd suggest this information be worked into the existing Anne Frank article, until such time as more concrete information is available to warrant its own article. Strikerforce^Talk 17:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Objection withdrawn, with the expansion of the article. Strikerforce^Talk 16:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up tags

WP:WTRMT states that tags should be removed "When an article talkpage discussion has not been initiated". Consequently, I plan to remove the tags added two weeks ago in a subsequent edit to the article. (Feel free to re-add along with detailed reasoning on this Talk: page.) —Sladen (talk) 10:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind removal of tags, however when I have a chance I will be removing passages that I believe are not supported by adequate sourcing. Whether the tags are there are not is secondary to the sourcing issue.Coretheapple (talk) 16:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to the article Talk: page.
All editors are welcome to initiate WP:BOLD edits. Usually the standard WP:BRD cycle is then followed, culminating in a discussion phase on the relevant article Talk: page.
One can also initiate a discussion directly by stating (ie. specifically and exactly) which precise sentence or sentences could be tweaked and improved. —Sladen (talk) 11:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC) (See also request for being precise made during Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold van den Bergh (notary) discussion)[reply]