Talk:Art Technology Group

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Atglogo.gif[edit]

Image:Atglogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added fair use rationale for use on ATG entry, removed warning tag JeffJonez (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but I put "Searchendising" in quotes, as it is a made up word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.126.103 (talk) 01:38, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Subsidiary[edit]

Hi, sure it is an subsidiarity? The atg.com website says "Copyright Oracle Corporation" and the management team pages and such just mention oracle has acquired them. I'd assume they are integrated. Anybody has facts supporting the one or the other? --93.104.48.17 (talk) 20:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to the German company register on https://www.unternehmensregister.de "Art Technology Group GmbH" was merged into "ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG." I assume the same happend in the U.S. --93.104.53.252 (talk) 11:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"operates under its own name as a subsidiary of Oracle." - I don't think that this this is the case anymore. Oracle have continued to use the ATG brand name but that's about all that exists of ATG. It is not a seperate business entity and is part of the Oracle suite. The ATG website now redirects into Oracle ATG Web Commerce Applications. Jackobs (talk) 05:15, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Art Technology Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.saveatg.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]