Talk:Repatriation (cultural property)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Collections Care (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Collections Care, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Collections CareWikipedia:WikiProject Collections CareTemplate:WikiProject Collections CareCollections Care articles

Culture Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2020 and 1 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Harney-p.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

My comments on the sand box version still mostly apply I think. The article needs lots of links, and the lead needs to be much longer. But it's coming on nicely. Many of the articles in the category should be linked to. Johnbod (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments! I will be working on your suggestions in the coming days. Psyoon (talk) 18:28, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive page. The breadth of the global discussion of the topic is useful as is your framing around colonialism and war. Good use of sources as well. Radavis147 (talk) 16:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality disputed

As is reflected in the lead's calling archeological/anthropological expeditions "looting", this article is biased against scientific research/scholarship and in favor of various nationalistic or otherwise parochial claims. It also has a considerable amount of politically correct jargon such as "colonialist discourse". Allens (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Art repatriation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100326162020/http://www.unidroit.org:80/english/conventions/1995culturalproperty/1995culturalproperty-e.htm to http://www.unidroit.org/english/conventions/1995culturalproperty/1995culturalproperty-e.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow wikipedians,

I intend to add more up to date information and links throughout this article but specifically focusing on the controversy section by adding detailed summaries of the current and past arguments for and against repatriation as well as key underlying aspects behind the ongoing repatriation debate. PQxr (talk) 21:43, 2 August 2021 (UTC) PQxr[reply]

Recent changes to lead, chronology and the list of international examples

Having found some repetitions and an inconsistent chronological order of the article, I have just tried to remedy these issues. Also, I have added summary information to the lead to reflect the scope of the article. - The description of the two sides for and against repatriations seems very useful, as well as the indication that there are some signs of overcoming this stalemate. The article is already quite long, and the list of section 5 International examples can be completed with more examples further to my additions of today, regarding Belgium, Germany, the UK and the US. Since the article deals first of all with the concept of repatriation, including some important historical examples, the list of many other international makes it too long in my view. I would rather suggest an new article or list of such examples and to order it according to continents, rather than by the alphabet. - As these changes and suggestions certainly are of interest to other editors of this very useful article, I am looking forward to their comments and suggestions. Munfarid1 (talk) 11:26, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but in the introduction there is a big scope on the Napoleonic Wars. And nothing else. This is not neutral. Regards, Marc-AntoineV (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Georgetown University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]