Talk:Arthur Paul Pedrick
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Clarified a few points in the article to make it clear that the applications were never followed through to become granted patents. 68.110.72.98 (talk) 00:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
This is not true. At the time Pedrick was active, patents were not published until grant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.71.10 (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Why is there no link to the actual patents? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.32.119.117 (talk) 21:49, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Catflap patent
[edit]"The idea was to detect the difference in fur colour between Ginger and another cat, "Blackie" from next door. If Blackie attempted to use the cat-flap, he would not be allowed in. Ginger was impressed with the idea, and further suggested that the concept could be applied as a nuclear deterrent. Ginger's concern over the Cold War and the nuclear arsenals threatening the world was a regular motivator for Pedrick's inventions."
What? His cat was concerned with Nuclear War? -75.111.17.178 (talk) 20:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, according to the patent application. GDallimore (Talk) 21:22, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Anyone wanting to expand/cite this article might find these useful. There's this in the World Patent Information journal, which I assume is a reliable source. There's also this blog; whilst a blog is not normally reliable, per WP:BLOG it may be, in this case, as the author has been working and publishing in the field for a good while (and been used as an expert by the BBC[1]). Bromley86 (talk) 11:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Arthur Paul Pedrick/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Needs expansion on him if you can, though I understand that it may be hard. I fnothing else add a few mor references.--Wizardman 19:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 19:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Arthur Paul Pedrick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080216024540/http://www.cpaglobal.com:80/ip-review-online/widgets/notes_quotes/more/1747 to http://www.cpaglobal.com/ip-review-online/widgets/notes_quotes/more/1747
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141210200532/http://www.theargus.co.uk/archive/2002/11/01/6749047.Crazy_creations_of_infamous_inventor/?ref=arc to http://www.theargus.co.uk/archive/2002/11/01/6749047.Crazy_creations_of_infamous_inventor/?ref=arc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC)