Talk:Ashmolean Museum

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Mid‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from Ashmolean Museum was copied or moved into Museum with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 6, 2007, June 6, 2008, and May 24, 2019.

Keeper or Curator?

Isn't 'curator' a more appropriate term than 'keeper'?

'Keeper' is the traditional title of curators at the Ashmolean - the reasons are lost in the mists of time!

Fair use rationale for Image:Alfred jewel.JPG

Image:Alfred jewel.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 18:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Alfred jewel.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Alfred jewel.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Papa November 10:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the Coin Collection into the list of collections

Hello, Just wondering - the antique coin collection is mentioned in the fist paragraph about the museum's history, but would it be considered notable enough to be added to the list of collections? http://www.culture24.org.uk/history+%2526+heritage/art73200 Here's a feature about the new coin gallery. Disclaimer: I work at Culture24. What do people think? Thanks, RosieClarke (talk) 15:15, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Papyrus section

A lot of papyrus fragments are listed as part of the Ashmolean Museum as the P. Oxy papyri. There are also some manuskripts of the bible. Are they still part of the Ashmolean or is the whole collection now part of the Sackler Library?--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 16:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kish Tablet

The article claims, that the Kish Tablet is in the possession of the Ashmolean Museum. The articke Kish Tablet however claims, that the Ashmolean only has a copy. Which is correct?

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ashmolean Museum/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Lots of good material here, but:

Could do with more structure: the lead is too long and much of it would be better off under a History subheading.
More references needed! Casper Gutman 23:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ashmolean Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ashmolean Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202061949/http://www.ashmolean.museum/Griffith.html to http://www.ashmolean.museum/Griffith.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:23, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date of Taylor Institution

The history section contains a description of the Taylor Institution which cites Alden's Oxford Guide from 1946. "One wing of the building is occupied by the Taylor Institution, the modern languages faculty of the university, standing on the corner of Beaumont Street and St Giles' Street. This wing of the building dates from 1845–48 and was also designed by Charles Cockerell, using the Ionic order of Greek architecture.^[1]" I have deleted "dates from 1845–48 and" which is of limited relevance and possibly incorrect as the Taylor Institution Conservation plan notes "Some sources list the completion date as 1847; however it must have been completed in 1845, as this completion date is listed in the 24th October 1846 edition of The Builder" Link: https://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/media/global/wwwadminoxacuk/localsites/estatesservices/documents/conservation/Taylor_Institution.pdf 81.86.211.166 (talk) 15:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Alden's Oxford Guide. Oxford: Alden & Company. 1946. p. 103.

Kish tablet

The one in exhibition is a plaster cast or the real thing? --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 16:01, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pococke Kition inscriptions

The only surviving example of the Pococke Kition inscriptions – all the rest were destroyed – is on display in room 18 of the Ashmolean Museum (https://collections.ashmolean.org/object/308786). This particular inscription was key to the decipherment of Phoenician by Jean-Jacques Barthélemy, 250 years ago (it is no.1 in the picture on the right). The Ashmolean Museum webpage does not highlight this - perhaps they are not aware. If anyone visiting the museum has time to take a photo, it would be a very helpful addition to our article. Onceinawhile (talk) 12:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Link

If you look at footnote 18 (Ashes to Ashmolean) and go to its external likk, it takes you to a site that is unrelated to the Ashmolean. 99.47.178.144 (talk) 09:06, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Alden's Oxford Guide. Oxford: Alden & Company. 1946. p. 103.

[1]