Talk:Asnuntuck Community College

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Asnuntuck Community College article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Connecticut Mid‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

First Amendment Controversy

Asnuntuck's page has been edited and re-edited several times in the last 24 hours... Even the section in question has been retitled from "Dismissal controversy" to "First amendment controversy" and back a couple of times. Nobody seems to have chimed in here, just editing. I suspect that someone at Asnuntuck has been involved, since I personally edited the section in question after noticing content biased very much in favor of Asnuntuck and clarified that FIRE - the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education - is not related to The Blaze or any firearms advocates (which has been implied several times by people editing the wiki.) Whoever is editing really ought to make him or herself known here - after all, one shouldn't be ashamed of his or her efforts to contribute to an open forum. That's what Wikipedia is, not a sounding board for unbalanced propaganda from either side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.66.100.229 (talk) 23:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The section appears fairly stable, and the POV warning was placed by an anonymous IP address editor, as is this comment. I plan to remove the POV warning unless someone points to a part of this section that still not neutral. Ahwiv (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]