|WikiProject Astrology||(Rated C-class)|
I am currently in the process of merging all the rather poor subarticles which aren't even mentioned here into this article. The quality is low but I'll work on that after gettng the text in. IRWolfie- (talk) 20:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Astrological aspect (Hindu Astrology) proposed merge
This recently created page seems like it belongs on this article. It does have substantive content, but perhaps could be shortened a little for the sake of brevity. Is there a consensus for this merge? I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- You may as well fire ahead, astrology pages don't tend to be very active (so it's sometimes good to ask at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Astrology), but a lot of unnecessary forks exist. I've been trying to merge/redirect many of the related but unnecessary stubs etc into this article. IRWolfie- (talk) 09:55, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oh...I just noticed there was Hindu Astrology as well. There is a link to the proposed page from there as well. Maybe that might be better? In any case, it doesn't seem to stand up on its own that well. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 17:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- This has already been discussed on user page and in AfC. The Hindu astrology article has a separate article for the major sections. This was one of the few missing major sections. Apples and oranges do not belong together. Every thing is consistent, everything is in order. -- :- ) Don 17:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Major aspects completely gone?
I realize that the previous entries for the major aspects (trine, opposition, etc.) were considered unsourced, but was completely deleting the section and all references to those aspects really the best thing to do? This page now just contains information about the minor aspects; there is zero information about the major ones, not even a mention of what they are. - Motsa (talk) 20:26, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Brilliant. The page for Quincunx includes information on every kind of quincunx except the astrological one. For that, you are directed here. But this page does not even mention the quincunx. All the See Also links come back here too. Astrology is back in the intellectual ghetto I see. BeeTea (talk) 13:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Where's the Quincunx astrological reference? Who deleted it, and why? What's wrong with you people? Seriously, what the f**ck? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 13:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Add the minor aspects section back in?
BS subject requires editorial excellence
This article is an article about a pseudoscience subject and should follow all relevant guidelines of such, i.e. WP:PSCI, Wikipedia:Fringe theories etc. if its content is to remain on Wikipedia. All statements not citing reliable sources in particular is liable to be removed completely.--Anders Feder (talk) 12:58, 18 June 2016 (UTC)