Talk:Attack on German Flatts (1778)

Attack on German Flatts (1778) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 22, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Military history: British / European / North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Attack on German Flatts (1778)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 01:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoy these articles and wish to review this one. MathewTownsend (talk) 01:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
background

"He recruited a mix of Iroquois and white Loyalists estimated " - aren't Loyalists by definition not Indian. I'm not clear what "white" clarifies. Removed Magic♪piano 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"He began his campaigning in late May" - began his campaign? Rephrased (especially since the "late May" bit was somewhat repetitive). Magic♪piano 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise, all is well. MathewTownsend (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for reviewing, glad you enjoy them (there are more in this thread on the way). Magic♪piano 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:

B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Provides references to all sources:

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed:

B. Remains focused:
Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Nice work! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]