Talk:Audenshaw School

Schools Mid‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reasoning for assessment: Not much here and no references. Adam McCormick 23:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Untitled

And this must be bjwebbs doing. Well, I'd better clean this up. Yellow Element 20:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Edits

Just added some additional links and alumni — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.137.125.205 (talk) 12:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hilarious though your teacher name puns and "lol he is a gay" comments are, they have no place here. Try writing a journal or something instead.

Reverted vandalism to teacher names and alumni.

194.9.188.21 13:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More vandalism repaired. 08:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Page views

Just sharing with editors that the press coverage surrounding the foiled killing spree alledged to have been planned for this school brought an upsurge of 500 views on 2 September 2009. Thanks to all those who helped improve the page during that time. :) --Jza84 | Talk 01:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content

An unidentified new user removed the content about the teacher charged with having sex with a pupil and I see the removal was soon reverted. As the woman hasn't been tried yet is it really necessary to reveal her name to the whole world when she may well be acquitted? I've removed her name and hope it will be left out of the article. I realise the reversion was quite legitimate and wikipedia isn't censored, but I don't think articles should be used as a news service either. To be honest I'm not sure this stuff, or the other case were two former pupils were tried and acquitted really belong in an encyclopaedia anyway. Richerman (talk) 00:29, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed mention of the incident altogether. The latest story says that a teacher "has been suspended from her job at a Greater Manchester School which cannot be named for legal reasons". If newspapers can't mention it for legal reasons, we certainly can't. Nev1 (talk) 12:26, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Content removed with regards to the incident above have now been confirmed and are permitted to be re-added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aspotofbother (talk • contribs) 12:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Audenshaw School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Make amendments to some references

As links were outdated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aspotofbother (talk • contribs) 12:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]