Talk:Australian Industry and Defence Network

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Australian Industry and Defence Network article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 November 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Australian Industry and Defence Network is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Military history: Logistics / South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military logistics and medicine task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Speedy deletion notice

@ScottDavis:

User:Dlthewave has nominated the article for deletion and notified the creator User:Pdfpdf, who created the stub in 2010, but then normally prolific Pdfpdf hasn't been active since August 2018. Looking at the history, the copyvio is due to additions by an SPA, User:Suemead, in March 2013.

Rather than deleting the article, I suggest that the copyvio edits be removed, or rewritten by someone with more knowledge of the field. Bahudhara (talk) 01:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the copyvio and changed the speedy-delete request to revdel so that it can be "rescued". Practically all of the text had been copy-pasted, including Pdfpdf's initial version of the article. The sources [1] and [2] are practically useless in my opinion but I'm preserving them here in case they can be used to find better secondary sources. –dlthewave ☎ 01:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I hid a bunch of revisions (maybe not as many as requested), and submitted what was left for AFD. User:Pdfpdf seems to have archived the notice you put on his talk page, but not otherwise responded, so he gets another one as the original contributor for an AFD. Those sources are only good for "The organisation says that it is..." --Scott Davis ^Talk 12:49, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]