Talk:Avalon (Stargate SG-1)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / Stargate

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Stargate task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Ancient translations[edit]

Ok, just so everyone is clear the following which I submitted:

This is an error on the writers' part, the Ancient writings in Glastonbury read exactly what they were translated into in English when for example "The Universe is infinite" should have read Universum est infinitus then Daniel would have known what this means then he would have understood it but it just said The universe is infinte which is wrong because that would mean the Ancients wrote in English but just decided to use their alphabet instead.
The text under Mitchell's numerical puzzle read Reflect one eight fold path, however, he was only able to describe the first word (Reflect) to Daniel. The following was translated using the full Ancient alphabet.

Is 100% accurate because I managed to get the Ancient font off the web and using screen caps and DVD's and a Latin translation program, I managed to decipher them accurately so please don't remove them.

--Faris b 04:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know this might sound stupid from me, but if I remember correct Latin uses Subject-Object-Verb order, so shouldn't it be Universum infinitus est? (infinitus is not the object, I know) btw, how do I make it so that my name and the time will be posted automatically?

--SoulCandy

I don't know, I used a translation program and that's what it gave me. Anyway, to make your name and date appear, type 4 tildes (~) in a row without spaces

Faris b 22:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers?[edit]

In which year the cavern was constructed by the ancients? How those numerals in the puzzle could be there? These are recent inventions...

Centralized TV Episode Discussion[edit]

Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. --Maniwar (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sg1-s09e01-0.jpg[edit]

Image:Sg1-s09e01-0.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Avalon (Stargate SG-1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120427143054/http://www.gateworld.net/news/2005/09/sci_fi_to_reinstate_full-length_.shtml to http://www.gateworld.net/news/2005/09/sci_fi_to_reinstate_full-length_.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Origin[edit]

Shouldn't the episode Origin be at least mentioned here? Although it's not "officially" Avalon, Pt 3, it sure feels like a conclusion of this multipart episode. Plus, on the List of Stargate SG-1 episodes it's printed in bold face, indicating it being part of a multipart episode. -- Tauriel (talk) 15:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]