Talk:Avionics Full-Duplex Switched Ethernet

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Misc

The first external reference is ok for the first few paragraphs, then it becomes a sales-pitch. I vote to throw it out and put something else in. Any suggestions? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.238.26.69 (talk • contribs) .

I think I may have put those links in. If you can find something more descriptive to use go ahead. Being a very niche product, there isn't a huge amount of information available. --StuffOfInterest 20:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence "However, though bandwidth and maximum end-to-end latency and jitter, links are guaranteed, there is no guarantee of packet deliver" is somewhat convoluted and hard to understand. Can an expert correct or expand? --Yelojakit (talk) 14:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad ext-link

The last external link:

ARINC 664 presentation

Does not work for me

85.48.159.95 15:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-VLs

Why are sub-VLs designed for "less critical data"? Sub-VLs are transmission queue that are read in round-robin. The objective is to provide a fair enqueuing mechanisms that guarantees that no message type of a set of different messages sent over the same VL is always the last to be sent. --SbotEng (talk) 18:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From what I understand of the standard, when a sub-VL enqueues a frame, it can not "guess" what it the workload already enqueue in the VL queue by the other sub-VL. Then, its own latency can not be guaranteed.MarcBoyerONERA (talk) 14:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ARINC 664 vs AFDX

I selected the ARINC 664 link from the ARINC main page and ended up on a page titled AFDX. As the article specifies, AFDX is specified in one of the 7 or 8 sections of the ARINC 664 specification. A broad generalization of AFDX is that it is a redundant form of ARINC 664. Based on this, it seems the article should be specifically about ARINC 664 and another page should be created to detail the AFDX section. anonymous 21-Feb-2011

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Avionics Full-Duplex Switched Ethernet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Safty-critcal use of AFDX

I see where it says AFDX is intended for safety critical applications. But there's nothing on it's actual use, what systems and what DALs, etc. Are there any sources for such use? Graham.Fountain | Talk 16:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]