Talk:B-wing

Origins

Dunno. Wookieepedia doesnae have it, and I've never heard that, and it doesn't appear in any of my reference works like the Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels. It should probably be removed. And while your point about credible militaries is well-taken, but it apparently is canon that exactly that was done with the early TIE Phantoms. --maru (talk) contribs 04:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Plagarized statements?

The statements "The B-wing is one of the Rebellion's most heavily-armed starfighters." and "Because the cockpit is surrounded by a unique gyrostabilization system, the pilot always remains stationary, even as the rest of the ship rotates during flight." were taken directly from the description of the B-wing in the Gamecube game Star Wars Rogue Squadron II: Rogue Leader. 24.50.211.226 13:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Failed GA nomination

I have reviewed this article, and do not feel that it currently meets the standards of a good article for the following reasons:

1. It is incomplete - where are the sections about the development of the concept, or the sections on reception or popularity of the B-wing? Is this a famous and loved Star Wars ship? Other than Return of the Jedi, what has the B-Wing appeared in? Although being overly short does not preclude an article from being a good article, I find it hard to believe that there's so little to say about the subject.
2. The "Depiction" section is written from an in-universe perspective, and, worse, fails to distinguish its fact from fiction.

Good luck revising the article. I look forward to reading it again. Phil Sandifer 21:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on B-wing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starwars.com/collecting/news/hasbro/news20010516.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071113095251/http://cargobay.starwars.com:80/webapps/cargobay/item-detail/12983 to http://cargobay.starwars.com/webapps/cargobay/item-detail/12983
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.fbtb.net/sets/index.asp?set=7180
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.starwars.com/collecting/news/lego/news20050708.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071113095246/http://cargobay.starwars.com:80/webapps/cargobay/item-detail/11947 to http://cargobay.starwars.com/webapps/cargobay/item-detail/11947
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928014432/http://www.decipher.com/starwars/cardlists/swallcards.pdf to http://www.decipher.com/starwars/cardlists/swallcards.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC)