Talk:BBC One "Rhythm & Movement" idents

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2006. The result of the discussion was keep and cleanup.

BBC Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Breakdancing? I'm almost certain thats closer to Parkour than Breakdancing. --Kiand 18:01, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem very similar. I guess it is open to interpretation. Wikiwoohoo 17:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Breakdancing is far more static tha Parkour, however. As a second however, the BBC have already had a promotional clip of what is definatively Parkour - they guy crossing the cities rooftops to get home to watch TV. They try not to reuse stuff, so maybe it is breakdancing... --Kiand 17:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's true. The men in the ident aren't crossing anything in the way of the man on the rooftops, they're strolling along and dancing. I think it most likely is breakdancing. Thanks for picking up on it though. I didn't know that art was called Parkour. You learn something new everyday round here! :) Wikiwoohoo 17:50, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The strolling implies its not breakdancing though - thats what I meant by static :)

Ah well, a far more productive thing to do would be to get a sample of Forever And A Day by State One to upload here. This is an incredibly detailed article for such an odd topic - the British and Irish television articles in general are pretty amazing. --Kiand 17:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[1] its a remix, and its wma streamed so hard to capture the relevant bits to sample. Bah. --Kiand 17:59, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I had a listen to it. Don't know if it'll be possible to get a sample but it's a good idea. Nice to hear that you like the British television articles, it's the aim of this Wikiproject that I'm involved in to improve all such articles.Wikiwoohoo

"Reflection"

What is the source for the claim that this ident has been "discontinued"? I saw it only a few days before the Christmas 2005 idents were introduced.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.93.21.9 (talk • contribs).

Removal of most images

As part of a rethink on fair use images with regards to the nomination of this and the other articles nominated for deletion back in December, I have decided that just the one image is good enough as an example of the style of the idents. This is already the case with the BBC One Balloon idents article and also now the BBC One 'Circle' idents article as well and in my opinion,--92.3.141.106 (talk) 01:31, 14 November 2010 (UTC)--92.3.141.106 (talk) 01:31, 14 November 2010 (UTC) the one image can just as adequately give a feel for what the article is referring to. I have listed the images removed from the article as orphaned fair use but would welcome any comments or suggestions. If you feel the images are better off within the article, feel free to add them back. Wikiwoohoo 19:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, actually: take a look at the BBC Two 1991-2001 idents article; it is, I feel, a lot better off with them. For that reason, I'll be adding them all back soon, for this and the Circles page, but they'll all be my own screenshots (so no problems with getting permission from the TV Room). _TheIslander 17:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, maybe images should be used as thumbnails for more reference. Perhaps reuse them but in a smaller size to compromise.--92.3.141.106 (talk) 01:31, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thread at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#Appropriate?. – sgeureka ^t•c 07:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

A Google News search for "+bbc ident" returns 1570 hits.

This seems to be clear evidence for BBC idents being a subject of legitimate encyclopedic interest.

I'm therefore removing the {{Notability}} tag. Jheald (talk) 10:55, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]