Talk:Babestation

Television: British / Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Total fancruft, needs a cleanup. Apparently replaced Game Network, don't really have any more info. – MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 16:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty awful and a sad reflection of TV in the UK at the moment. It basically a tame sex phone-line but on TV. Viewers can call or text messages to women wearing few clothes. That's about it.

The history is covered on the Game Network page. 84.92.35.164 07:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who is that West Indian rapper bloke who appears in their adverts...? [User Calibanu] 16.20, 30 July 2007

I have removed the terms 'girls' and 'babes' and used 'women' instead. I have also corrected some fairly noxious English. I hope this is acceptable (if it's not, do your worst, but please don't tell me about it!) Heenan73 (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cast section needs a cleanup

It looks like its all original research, with no references. 123dylan456 (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

18 U.S.C.Record Compliance Statements

Is that paragraph really needed? It makes the article read like the disclaimer you see at the start of XXX videos. 68.146.70.124 (talk) 13:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership of Babestation

I work for Cellcast, and I wanted to ask if something could be corrected with regards the last line of the "History" section. Babestation is a show/format on the channel Babenation, and is owned and operated by Game Network BV (as per http://www.babestation.tv/2257), is it possible to correct this?

Also when someone searches currently for Andrew Wilson's name and Babestation, this is one of the top results. This has caused confusion and issue with people and for Andrew’s family, assuming his role is actually on screen or his family members are involved. I appreciate that he has been involved with Babestation but is it possible to remove his name in this case as it would not actually affect the article if his name was not there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cellcast Dani (talk • contribs) 17:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Queen's funeral

A viral tweet claimed to show an electronic program guide with Babestation (and other pornographic channels) showing the Queen's Funeral. This was fairly clearly a photoshop (the channel names don't line up with the program names), but a couple of tabloids/aggregators (Daily Star, Indy 100) wrote it up as if it was real. There's no other source for this (even Babestation itself doesn't confirm it and hints that it was a joke). So I'm sorry, but I've removed that from the article. Smurrayinchester 07:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]