Talk:Babu Muhammad Rafique

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Haroon Akram Siraj (talk) 19:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

because this article is the only source of information about the deceased.

@Haroon Akram Siraj: That is a reason to delete the article. If there are no reliable sources to cite in the article, the subject may not have an article. —C.Fred (talk) 19:35, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He is listed as a former MPA for West Pakistan (now the Punjab), so that means speedy deletion is not an option. It could still be deleted through normal deletion channels. —C.Fred (talk) 20:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]