Talk:Bajaur casket

On 8 January 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Bajaur Casket. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

References

PHG, you need to insert a real citation from the "Metropolitan Museum notice". The casket seems to really exist according to some papers[1][2][3] but I can't find any photography of the object except your photo. Your credibility on photography is challanged and Durova's speech may be right unless you don't provide "exact source" for this picture. --Appletrees (talk) 13:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S, you can't edit the article per your probation under Arbicom, so just give your reference here. --Appletrees (talk) 13:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Casket notice at the MET

I am delighted to help. Please find hereafter the Metropolitan Museum of Art notice to the casket in the article. You will notice that the environment of the two photographs is different, but that's because the casket had been removed to a separate exhibition (in another room) when I visited. You will also notice however that there is only 4 minutes between the two photographs (time to move from one room to the other). Hope you like it. PS: I uploaded under Fair Use, hope this will do. Please help if there's a better solution. Cheers. PHG (talk) 19:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good, I usually forget to take a picture of such notices. I think the image is really necessary for the article until finding other articles published with the relic. :) --Appletrees (talk) 16:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bimaran casket which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology Math error?

Azes I's 63rd year from 48/7 BC would be 15/16, not 5/6, right? Cornelius (talk) 01:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]