Talk:Bardahl

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 June 7. The result of the discussion was keep.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

Business Stub‑class

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

POV?

The majority of this article (from "Background" onwards, added in the past few days by IP editors) seems rather POV. DH85868993 14:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems? It reads like an ad copy, slightly modified for Wikipedia. The whole article should probably be deleted.Unright (talk) 21:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The brand and its history are important; the massive listing of every single product is probably not (I suspect it was copied and pasted from the corporate website). Remove the "catalog" at the end of the article, along with some of the more promotional language, and it's fine. Duncan1800 (talk) 06:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who has the authority to definitely modify this article? I agree with Duncan. Keep the article up the the extensive product listing. 15:04, 3 march 2009 (EST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.83.103.33 (talk)

There is no authority. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. But most volunteer editors agree that articles that look like press releases should be rewritten. Also, see conflict of interest, since this was very likely written by Bardahl employees. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]