This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
The above source has a bit about Barkhale in comparison to other causewayed enclosures in Sussex. There's a bit about the landscape context, saying that Barkhale has a "single-directional view". Richard Nevell (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
After reading Drewett, Leach, Russell, and the discussion of this in Oswald et al, I decided to leave this out of this article. The bit you cite is in the context of Drewett's division of these enclosures into two types, and Russell makes the argument that Drewett's division is untenable. I don't think I can cite Drewett for this without going into the debate and I think that belongs in the parent article, causewayed enclosure. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]