Talk:Battle of Basra (2007)

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Siege of Cimic House

Surely there should be some mention of the siege of CIMIC-House, where the British were victorious. 193.195.193.251 (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What Year?

Will add 2007 (cat) as per article Hugo999 (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Danish withdrawal

I removed the following: "The Danish contingent of 470 soldiers were coming under attack and by 2 August the Danish army withdrew from Iraq." This suggests that the Danish Army withdrew solely because it was being fired upon. As of before the so called "Siege of UK bases in Basra", Denmark had lost 7 soldiers (4 as result of enemy activity), and a rough exit strategy had begun to take form in January 2007. The final plan came in March. While both facts in the sentence might be true, they are not related. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.104.153.43 (talk) 21:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Siege of UK bases in Basra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080110145456/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article2242151.ece to http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article2242151.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]