Talk:Battle of Zawichost

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Military history: Medieval B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reverting

This article looks much better now, with new info that is sourced. but I see that there's a dispute between Ghir and Hali and perhaps Irpen. What's the dispute about? --Candide, or Optimism 13:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I have no idea. The guys did a great job adding info to the article. However, at the same time they simply deleted all the info that was already there - for no apparent reason. If the reasons are personal, which is quite probable IMO, then this could be better solved at my talk page rather than by deleting my work just because. Or am I wrong? //Halibu tt 13:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now I get it. Thanks to an edit comment by Irpen I discovered that the problem were Russo and Ukrainophobic terms. I guess what he referred to is the usage of the term Ruthenia, which has been Ukrainophobic at least since early middle ages. Even late Romans hated ancient Ukrainians apparently... Not to mention a Ukrainophobic chemical element... :D If that really was the problem, I'm happy to see Irpen fix it properly this time. //Halibu tt 17:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I simply rewrote the article from scratch and some parts were ommitted. I did not delete Halibutt's reinserting them later. OTOH, I do find it amusing (not even annoying) that Halibutt keeps reinserting polonocentric names into articles. What' Wlodimirec is doing for the town name of the Rurikid time? That is an old problem of this editor and I am tired of cleaning up Russo- Ukrainian related article after Halibutt's intrusion from the modern Polish names. Others see the same problem with his edits to Lithuanian articles. I just don't get this stubbornes but in no way I want to delete anything just based on that. I simply corrected the names in my recent edits. Finally thanks for the compliments. I spent quite some time digging through sources on this misterious "battle", which I would have called an "Ambush of Zawichost". Since the article is now totally rewritten and unstubbed, it might qualify for DYK. --Irpen 18:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you assumed my good will you'd probably noticed that I'm merely using the names I know, since using the names I don't know could be quite hard. And even if, your (and Ghirlandajo's) decision to delete all my edits for no reason at all instead of fixing the names was not a step in the good direction. Such behaviour is not seen by some as harmful, but by all, as it perfectly fits the definition of vandalism. I'm glad you changed your ways now.

As to DYK - sure, feel free to add it. I'll try to dig up some more on the battle as soon as I get home. //Halibu tt 19:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Halibutt, I've seen you around here long enough to know what to asume, that is good faith superimposed on an extremely Polonocentric world picture intermingled with a self-denied but obvious hatred toward Russia. As to this edit, I did not delete it a single time. I corrected the names, that's all. And if you don't know non-Polish names of the places, as you claim, Wikipedia articles on those towns is a good place to find them. I was tempted to join your debate with Dan on Wilno, but what new I can tell you, especially after Wasylkowce, etc still at the PSW template? I can only clean up a fixed amount of this stuff. I don't have molobos to run revert wars on my behalf. --Irpen 19:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. I must show this edit of yours to either my Russian teacher or my friends from Kiev who visit me next week. I'm sure they'd be delighted to know that "I hate them even if I don't know it". Sorry, Irpen. Don't expect me to feed you any more. //Halibu tt 22:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Zawichost. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060720092245/http://www.vesna.org.ua/txt/dov/istukr/IIIh.html to http://www.vesna.org.ua/txt/dov/istukr/IIIh.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]