Talk:Bethann Siviter

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 July 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Untitled

Have archived comments from initial start-up. Thank you for help. Just a few thoughts now on my first page:/startup editing comments - no longer contextual

When helping someone new or who you might assume to be new, the more specific and direct your comments the better. Saying "Fix this" is helpful. Saying "Fix this: do this with that, and that with this because..." is wonderfully helpful and sure to win loving thoughts in your direction. Do not assume everyone understands as well as you do: giving a directive to "read the manual" is okay, but it is important to realise that not everyone reads the manual and comes to the same conclusion: the help that pointed out what I needed to change, how it needed to change and why was the best and most useful information. I had read the manual, but didn't understand how I had not done what it recommended until someone else pointed it out. NurseUK (talk) 23:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NurseUK, since you seem to know the subject of the article personally, would you be able to get a photograph of her? Perhaps you can take a digital photograph of her and include it in the article. Then you might also want to consider adding an infobox for this person. See WP:Images and WP:Info for more information or feel free to post any specific questions that you may have. Just make sure any photograph adheres to WP:Copyright Image Guidelines. will381796 (talk) 01:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Am not sure a photo of a living person would be useful, informative or benefical? Am unsure, even after reading guidance on how to add categories (British or English nurses) to this article. Am also unsure what an infobox will provide, as the link above does not provide any information. Thank you. Have added link from BCU site. Elsevier site not appropriate for link. RCM site not appropriate for link. There is no workplace related site. Categories for nurses seem to be appropriate. Sorry, am still new and learning. HoneyAS (talk) 04:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bethann Siviter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]