Talk:Better Government Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Chicago  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Better Government Association/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grammarxxx (talk · contribs) 21:12, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Doesn't adhere to MoS, including references.
    A. References to sources:
    No in-line citations: accessdate, author, work, ect...
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Majority of works cited is to the subjects webpage, not a RS.
    C. No original research:
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Definitely not, this organizations been around for nearly 100 years and this is all there is?
    B. Focused:
    Too many minor details.
  3. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Impossible without RS.
  4. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  5. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  6. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

I am quickfailing this article due to a lack of comprehensiveness and poor references that cannot be fixed within 7 days. This article was created yesterday by a new user, I suggest the user read over the good article criteria before nominating any other articles. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 21:17, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

POV and other tags[edit]

This article has fundamental problems. Nearly every sentence is strongly biased in wording and content in favor of the subject. Combine that with terrible sourcing in violation of our policies on both verifiability and original research, and I propose we stubify the article and start anew. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Better Government Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Better Government Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)