Talk:Big Brothers Big Sisters of America

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Big Brothers Big Sisters is the oldest and largest youth mentoring organization in the United States.

Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point

Cleanup Co-ordination

This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.

The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:

the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English.
the article has multiple overlapping problems.
the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article

For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style.

As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page.

Discussion

The links section is excessive. I believe that two official links, to the US and International sites, would be sufficient - otherwise we could be linking to every single Big Brothers page, of which there are many; this is in violation of the policy on excessive links. Additional third-party links would help as well. --otherlleft 16:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The page reads like an advertisement for the association and the comments on the talk page were deleted by an anonymous user. A revamp is needed by someone knowledgeable about the organisation but not connected to it... Simulato (talk) 05:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as well. Although this organization is definitely notable and the article should not be deleted, it reads far too much like an advertisement. For example, the bolded text of "the oldest, largest and most effective youth mentoring organization in the United States"... That is strange styling. In fact, it is quite poor styling. "Big Brothers Big Sisters mentors children, ages 6 through 18, in communities across the country - including yours."? That is not encyclopedic. This article needs a major revamp, and, like Simulato said, by someone preferably NOT from the organization but knowledgeable about it? --Heero Kirashami (talk) 04:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely think that as part of the cleanup that 'Donations' link should go. No matter how good the cause, it looks too much like WP is soliciting donations for the group. Kay Dekker (talk) 19:33, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The content of this page could definitely be filled by gathering the numerous studies and their statistics. There has not been a dramatic update to the page and I believe that it could benefit many to have a clear non-biased understanding of Big Brothers Big Sisters. Chrisanchezz (talk) 03:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion?

This article needs to be completely redone from the ground up. It is blatant advertising.--Borealis9 (talk) 08:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe most of the advertising has been removed, or changed into a more neutral view and just stating the facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.31.74.140 (talk) 17:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Abuse

A section needs to be added to deal with the numerous convictions of BBBS mentors for sex abuse or rape of their charges. eg David Foley,

eg a 1987 article: http://articles.latimes.com/1987-10-13/local/me-13913_1_big-brother

Across the country, at least 22 Big Brothers were convicted of sex crimes from 1982 to 1987 after taking sexual liberties with their charges, according to Big Brothers of America records. Records kept by Big Brothers of Greater Los Angeles show that, since 1982, at least five of its volunteers have been convicted in the area. A sixth case is pending.

There are countless more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.194.228 (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Big Brothers Big Sisters.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Big Brothers Big Sisters.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Big Brothers Big Sisters.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Big Brothers Big Sisters of America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Review of Edits to Big Brothers Big Sisters of America Page

Hello Wikipedia Editors,

I recently made several updates to the Big Brothers Big Sisters of America (BBBSA) Wikipedia page to reflect current information and improve clarity. I aimed to ensure that all changes are supported by reliable sources and adhere to Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality and verifiability. Would an editor be available to review these edits for accuracy and compliance with Wikipedia guidelines? I’d appreciate any feedback or recommendations for further improvement.

Thank you very much for your time and assistance. Smonie12345 (talk) 05:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everytthing reverted. You deleted referencecd content and added unreferenced content. Also, asked if conflict of interest or paid. David notMD (talk) 12:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]