Talk:Bispham High School Arts College
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
[edit]'Strongly disagree'. This school appears to have been picked at random based solely on it being mentioned on WP:Schools because it had been vandalised, presumably by school pupils. I have worked on this page for some time now to ensure any vandalism is quickly removed, and to start improving the article so that is well written and more comprehensive. And also intend to maintain the article as it is in my Watchlist so any vandalism will be quickly removed. Having said that, there has been very little vandalism of this article recently. '♦Tangerines BFC ♦'·Talk 16:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I am 'against the proposed merge' of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page. Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here - Drappel 22:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC) x
Assess
[edit]The article is a bit light for a B (but only just) but it is well referenced. Interesting pictures. Well done! Victuallers 14:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BHSAClogo.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:BHSAClogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bispham High School Arts College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070406091154/http://blackpoolgrand.co.uk/links.php to http://www.blackpoolgrand.co.uk/links.php
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/ViewArticle.aspx?SectionID=62&ArticleID=1865735 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/ViewArticle.aspx?SectionID=62&ArticleID=2690884 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/ViewArticle.aspx?SectionID=62&ArticleID=2708563
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)