Talk:Bite Me! (film)

This page was proposed for deletion by Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment:
No attempts have been made to assert notability, see explanation on talk page from over a year ago
It was contested by MichaelQSchmidt (talk · contribs) on 2009-12-21 with the comment:
Better late than never. I found multiple genre reviews and in searching through them found several in reliable sources. I have expanded the article and added refs. will edit more later

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

1) A cursory internet search only returns a single review from Rotten Tomatoes.

2) The IMDB reference does not meet notability guidelines per WP:NOTFLLM

3) There is no full-length featured newspaper articles from large circulation newspapers or full-length magazine reviews and criticism reviewing the film.

4) The film is widely distributed, but it has not received full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.

5) The film is not historically notable.

6) The film was is not considered notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals. (Yes the five years has not passed, but really, do you think this film will be on any of thoise lists?)

7) The film has not bee featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.

8) The film has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

9) The film has not been selected for preservation in a national archive.

10) As far as a internet search is concerned, the film is not "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program.

11) The film does not in any way, shape or form represent a unique accomplishment in cinema, a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of United States cinema.

12) The article has not had any updates in over a year since it creation (Feb 2007) and it appears the author is no longer active on Wikipedia and has abandoned the entry.

I beleive this film should be given a prod tag. It does not meet notability requirements of WP:NOTFLLM and should be nominated for deletion. Barton Foley (talk) 12:57, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving this article

A deeper search through the great number of genre reviews discovers enough to meet WP:NF. I have added a few sources and begun cleanup and expansion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

After claenup and sourcing I determined that several of the individuals in this article may merit articles per WP:ENT, and so set them as redlinks.

I invite editors to consider creating these articles, being sure to include their filmograpjies and links to reviews of their filmwork. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bite Me! (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090326234058/http://www.wirenh.com:80/Film/Tales_from_the_Video_Vault/'Bite_Me!'_20051026823.html to http://www.wirenh.com/Film/Tales_from_the_Video_Vault/'Bite_Me!'_20051026823.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]