Hello, This is one of the CAs of appointed for your class. I was going through you article and I have noticed that you haven't put a lot of references, and also, probably it's incomplete. Please consider working on these issues in order to avoid the removal of unreferenced content.Gunit31 (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
We are adding information, pictures and references to it currently. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madhura gurjar (talk • contribs) 16:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
It is good to see that you have worked on the article since and this is really appreciated. Please continue your work and you will certainly benefit. Thank you. Gunit31 (talk) 06:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
When it is ready get experienced wikipedians to have a look at it - e.g. by posting a link to the sandbox on the talk pages of relevant articles.
Otherwise this article might be WP:PRODed or taken to AfD. DexDor (talk) 21:41, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Whilst agreeing with much of the sentiment here, I'd suggest leaving it as a minimal stub, rather than redirecting to boiler or steam boiler. Neither of these articles are good enough to be redir targets. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:18, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
Hello, I have made an attempt to deal with the issues of this article. I am not an expert on the subject matter. So apologies if any inappropriate content is noticed, please excuse me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunit31 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Gundit. Your edits aren't bad. The only problem is that the text you've written reads like an essay or story instead of an encyclopedia. This is just my opinion. Also, the lede section was following the manual of style before you changed it. That's a little more concrete of an issue than the prose issue I mentioned before. OlYeller21Talktome 15:29, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
All right, I will keep this in mind and make every attempt to improve my style of writing in future. However, for now I would request you to please revert the changes that are inappropriate. And its Gunit by the way.
Hey Gunit, sorry for getting your name wrong. I hope you haven't taken offense. I apologize.
I think you're definitely on the right track so please don't be discouraged. I've reverted the prose issue edits already. Everything else looks good to me. OlYeller21Talktome 17:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey guys I also threw in some editing and hope it all comes off alright. It was a lot of terms that I am not familiar with so I just did some basic stuff. Cleanelephant (talk) 19:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC)