Talk:Booked Out

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 May 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Untitled

Hi, I am the writer/director of the film Booked Out and I was adding it into your repository. I don't believe I have added any content that is outwith that provided by other films and looked at other films (science of sleep, amelie, happy go lucky) as examples of what to add. If you need me to change anything then please indicate what changes are required. As I stated on the page... the information provided is the same as exists on the films IMDB page which is essentially factual information. Bookedoutfilm (talk) 10:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is conflict of interest. See WP:COI. Generally, people should never, ever make articles about themselves or their products or companies on Wikipedia. It raises serious questions about neutrality and the ability to write an unbiased article. I hope you understand. elektrik SHOOS 11:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read the guidelines and it doesn't state that those involved can't add/edit content but they "take great care to edit to an exceedingly high standard of neutrality." I feel that I have done this and have taken other entries into account to show when creating mine to ensure that the material is neutral. I re-read the content and can't see anything that I would define as promotion of the film within the text. How do we proceed from here? [I also had to change my username as I contravened another of the wikipedia guidelines. Think I am compliant now] Bryanoneil (talk) 12:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Booked Out (2012) Film Poster.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Booked Out (2012) Film Poster.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Booked Out (2012) Film Poster.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:25, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Booked Out. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105033743/http://www.close-upfilm.com/2012/02/booked-out-uk-theatrical-release-set-for-march-12th/ to http://www.close-upfilm.com/2012/02/booked-out-uk-theatrical-release-set-for-march-12th/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]