Talk:Boot (torture)

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

European history Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources

Anyone have any? In particular, the 'Spanish boot' isn't mentioned anywhere in our fairly thoroguh article on Inquisition, which makes me suspect it's, in whole or part, anti-Catholic propaganda... The Land 09:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore me - found one. The Land 19:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More boots

In one now-removed section, references was made to The Big Book of Pain, by Donnelly and Diehl. This is not, as far as I am concerned, a reliable source for an encyclopedia. I don't really believe that The History Press is such a great publishing company (I have seen no evidence to suggest it is), and the authors are known for writing TV shows of the highly popular kind--you know, cannibalism, ghosts, etc. Moreover, I can find no reviews of the book or citations, so I have no choice but to conclude that it is not a reliable source per WP:RS. Besides, the language used was not very encyclopedic. Drmies (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a reliable source

Donnelly and Diehl drew from many sources. Further, as rather an expert in the history of torture--I would say I own about 75 books on the subject--I can assert that they have drawn from some rock-solid sources. Even the putatively rock-solid sources can be questionable at times: for example, even though Sair (often incorrectly cited as Hirsch) draws directly from Shrewsbury and even says so, he manages to come up with one or two technologies that mysteriously make no appearance in Shrewsbury, such as his "instep borer": blades were certainly plunged through insteps, but there was never a discrete, screw-operated device that specifically immobilized and so tortured the naked foot.

Game of Thrones

I believe a foot screw was used in the most recent episode of the Game of Thrones season 3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.197.137.25 (talk) 17:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Foot screw

That was not a foot screw per se. Rather, it was a fictitious, ahistorical, and rather hastily concocted prop of uncertain functionality. (In actuality, I don't imagine it had any functionality: its only design requirement was to look convincing!)

Removing unsourced or vastly undersourced material

I've removed unsourced or undersourced material from an editor who seems to have a history of hopping from IP address to IP address to evade blocks, while depositing speculative material that's unsourced, badly sourced, unverifiably sourced, or misleadingly sourced.

Porcsten (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]