Talk:Break-action
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Merge
[edit]Am I mistaken, or is this article identical to Break action? Maury 22:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- The topic is identical, so they definately need to be merged. I think "break open" is a more common term than "break action", and if you want to get picky, "top break" is the term I generally hear reguarding revolvers. I did a quick Google search on ("break action" shotgun) and one on ("break open" shotgun) and got 1,020 vs 2,440 hits respectively, so that seems to bear out "break open" being the more common term. scot 14:59, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Cool, I'll merge into this article then. Thanks! Maury 19:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that was the right thing to do- I've never heard "Break open" being used by, well, anyone who actually knows what they're talking about. I propose this be shifted back to "Break Action", in line with articles like Bolt action, Lever action, and so on. --Commander Zulu 14:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Fjestad (Blue Book of Gun Values) describes the T/C Contender, NEF Handi-Rifle, the H&R single shot pistols and shotguns variously as "break open action", "break open", or "hinged break open". Chuck Hawks calls them "break action". The manufacturers' websites don't ever name the action, they just call them "single shot". I suppose there could also be some regional variation involved in the term used. Perhaps the best thing would be to call it "break open action", since that's probably the most descriptive name and it would fit the existing naming naming convention. scot 15:45, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- The problem is, these are all American sources. Commonwealth English use is "Break action"- every State in Australia's firearms licensing departments register double-barrel shotguns, Thompson Contenders, and so on as "Break Action". "Break Open" is the term used informally, and "Break Open Action" is crazily redundant, IMHO. --Commander Zulu 23:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Unless anyone has any formal objections, I'll arrange for this article to be moved to "Break Action" shortly. --Commander Zulu 14:47, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- The problem is, these are all American sources. Commonwealth English use is "Break action"- every State in Australia's firearms licensing departments register double-barrel shotguns, Thompson Contenders, and so on as "Break Action". "Break Open" is the term used informally, and "Break Open Action" is crazily redundant, IMHO. --Commander Zulu 23:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
they are also known as crack-barrel71.145.182.246 00:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- I can't say I've ever heard that particular designation before- is it region specific? --Commander Zulu 01:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Contradiction
[edit]Under the "Advantages" and "Disadvantages" section, there appears to be a contradiction:
- The break open action is one of the strongest and most compact firearms actions. - Break-open actions are also not as inherently strong as other action types
...which is correct? BobTheMad (talk) 06:24, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- @BobTheMad: Maybe it's referring to break-action shotguns (strong) versus break-action revolvers (weak)? Faceless Enemy (talk) 12:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Break-action. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928192419/http://www.briley.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=102 to http://www.briley.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=102
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
No sources since October 2008
[edit]Who knows where the author of this article, @Fluzwup: got his information. Maybe it was written entirely from personal knowledge. But since it's currently unverifiable we should think about cutting it down to what can be found in sources, and perhaps merging it to a parent article, like Action (firearms).