Talk:Bromoethane

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals: Core Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 27 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MaryGrace J. Larsen. Peer reviewers: Nstynka, Tlewis10020, Jasmineburke.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To me, EtBr=Ethydium Bromide

EtBr seems like a perfectly logical abbreviation for bromoethane, but please note that to anybody with a molecular biology background, EtBr will mean ethydium bromide. Just be careful while you're doing research on this topic. --24.5.194.174 (talk) 16:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bromoethane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051012221857/http://www-cie.iarc.fr/htdocs/monographs/vol71/068-bromoeth.html to http://www-cie.iarc.fr/htdocs/monographs/vol71/068-bromoeth.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probable error in section: Preparation

Look at the last part of the Preparation section. It currently reads:
Or Bromoethene reacts with hydrobromic acid to form Bromoethane.

CH2=CH2 + HBr ---------. CH3-CH2Br

The reaction with symbols disagrees with the text. I think the text is incorrect, and the 2nd word should be "ethene" or "ethylene" instead of Bromoethene. Someone who knows more than I do, should actually do this edit. (While doing the edit, one could also make an arrow symbol by changing one period to a "greater than" sign.) Oaklandguy (talk) 03:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I removed the flawed part. Please keep looking for other errors.--Smokefoot (talk) 04:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]