Talk:C. E. M. Hansel

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Working on improving the page

Hi, I'm going to work on improving this page. If anyone has anything they think should be added, please leave the details here on the talk page for me. Cheers! JohnnyBflat (talk) 10:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've uploaded my rewrite. Cheers! JohnnyBflat (talk) 08:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've got the three editions (1966, 1980, 1989) of his main book on ESP, in case you need anything. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 20:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks! I found full copies of the 1966 and 1980 versions on archive.org but they didn't have the 1989 copy. I may hit you up in the future if I need to.JohnnyBflat (talk) 01:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The 1989 edition is important because it answers Palmer and Rao about their 1987 article. --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 13:53, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]