Talk:CLs method (particle physics)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CLs method (particle physics) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 6 December 2011 by reviewer Alpha Quadrant (talk · contribs).

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Notation issues[edit]

I am having a hard time appreciating what the notation used in Equation 1 is supposed to mean. The meaning of the condition is far from clear. For example, the denominator is written $P(\theta _{up}<\theta |0)$ , which based on the numerator appears to mean $P(\theta _{up}<\theta |\theta =0)$ , which seems like it should simply reduce to $P(\theta _{up}<0)$ which is clearly not what it is intended since this is zero always (following the logic $P(A<b|b=c)=P(A<c)$ for random variable A with parameter b and real number c).

Anyway some clarification would be very beneficial. Bjfar (talk) 23:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]