Talk:Cagayan Heritage Conservation Society

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Speedy keep, 18 May 2020, see discussion.
Speedy keep, 18 May 2020, see discussion.
keep, 3 April 2020, see discussion.

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Borderline promotional

I think the page is borderline promotional. This page should be thoroughly checked for conflict of interest. SciPunk (talk) 11:41, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SciPunk: Precisely! I nominated it for deletion but then it was prematurely closed by administrator Bradv (talk · contribs) and the conflict of interest, WP:TOOSOON, and self-promotion was not discussed at all. —Allenjambalaya (talk) 12:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Allenjambalaya: Also, please take a look at Special:Contributions/Jbuigat, the user's contribution history. I have sufficient reason to believe that the user is using either unpublished or fake (make-believe) sources (see Allacapan or Aparri for examples). The whole edit history reeks of promotional statements, sources, and overall disruptive editing. I do not know how to appeal to ban the user to prevent further disruptive editing since I am not thoroughly well-versed in navigating Wikipedia.SciPunk (talk) 12:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SciPunk: Whoa! Ah revelation. I see... I had to see it for myself then I saw [[1]]. He's up to something especially to articles related to the Cagayan region.—Allenjambalaya (talk) 12:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Allenjambalaya: I wonder what's the best recourse here. Right now I am undoing the damages done.—SciPunk (talk) 12:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SciPunk: Thanks! I already reported him here. If you want, I put the list of the defaced articles. Crazy, he maybe made a Wikipedia article about himself. Will do the same too.—Allenjambalaya (talk) 13:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

deletion

should this be nominated for deletion? surely there is more proof of fakery? Clone commando sev (talk) 00:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Clone commando sev:Considering the context of who, what, and how this article was created, I support this. —SciPunk (talk) 11:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Clone commando sev: I nominated it for deletion before due to notability and they decided to keep it.—Allenjambalaya (talk) 08:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

is it possible to renominate an article for deletion? or is that seen as bad faith? Clone commando sev (talk) 22:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Clone commando sev: No, not at all. Go ahead. I'll be voting delete citing its notability as too soon to be put here in Wikipedia.—Allenjambalaya (talk) 04:10, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I took the time to verify the facts here and do some copyedits. Thanks to @SuperAstig: for bringing back the links. Noticed that most of it are just copy-pasted. Probably not fake but an existing group. Though we appreciate the efforts of the society, It's up for fellow editors to vote for its notability.—Allenjambalaya (talk) 07:21, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]